Mamba 24 ch06 Black or White
From C64 Diskmag Wiki
here comes what you have been waiting for ??? some people do not see the beam in their own eyes, so we were highly thrilled to see a mamba<-magazine review in issue #006 of shock, censor design's diskmagazine. loading up the column called 'spotlights' (the column's name was already flattering us), we finally got to the review of mamba< issue #23 (the latest issue) surprise, surprise, gene (x-dom, now deadline) tried to bless the dear reader with his literary effusion. a mamba< review by gene of deadline oh yes, and the wiseacre did find quite a few things to criticize, mainly he pointed out how mamba< lost its objectivity, sides with friends, and that the editor has an 'attitude problem'. (btw. i did not know that) to back up his claims he quoted all kind of people, quoted mamba<, and gave lots of examples to make people believe how much this magazine changed during the last months. here is a major argument that was used: (about 'month in brief', 1st column) "this section had mistakes, some totally uninteresting crap, and some of the most stupid charts we have ever seen" sounds like omg in his best times... now,gene backs up his words by giving examples for this statement: "sorceress never admitted that she had phonesex with bod" "the voting topic was totally irrelevant" we say, sorceress did admit it in a released chatfile; we say, the voting topic was appropriate, many people told us so. "irrelevant" is only shock's opinion, doesn't belong there "...the most stupid charts we have ever seen.." gene asks about forgotten games in the list of first releases: "will you add it in the next issue ?" genius gene is already able to give us the answer by himself: "nope, ..." then we stop and think and ask our- selves what we have done when we did add 'the power, by genesis' and 'j.w. compend, by ils' to the list of first-releases, after forgetting those games the month before ??? so try again gene : "and to give a game from double density the same amount of points like a release from ocean is sheer stupidity... ...diskgames should not be counted" okey, nothing wrong with that argument, let us quote the same issue of shock, column 'the us-scene': "...terminator 2+ from ocean..." (by tsm) "...called snake mania +2..." (by double density, by exc) (same column, the charts: ) " releases 3. excalibur ... 5 (incl. snake m.) 4. tsm ... 4 (incl. term. 2)" good work gene, you 'advice' mamba< not to count magazine games, but by the same token, in the same issue shock does it by itself...cool! we don't mind, another one: (about the news & rumours section) "gp & victims never were in a co-op" genius gene wants to correct us, not knowing that these groups really have been in cooperation, any genesis member can be asked for confirmation. another one: "kt left gp months ago" "the blueboxing system did not only change in germany" we did not claim 'kt' left gp just recently, we did not claim the blue- box-system did change only in germany so i honestly do not see the sense in those statements, the more i could ask why didn't shock mention roy as a new member of genesis, as you listed up all other mew members ??? again we can only say you should spend the time correcting your own mistakes before looking what other people do... gene is going to try another one: gene complains about the cure's board being in the mamba< board charts: because... "the cure said that nobody could vote for his board" (quote,gene in shock) ok, no problem with that, but is it really our fault when there are people who do not obey the cure and vote for his board though ? are we supposed to leave those votes out then ? wouldn't that be called a cheat ? answer the questions by yourself, 'dearest' reader. well, gene would not have taken those votes into consideration, because he says: "...what that board does in the charts when you knew the cure didn't want it listed" is that what shock does ? isn't that called cheat ? self-explanatory... the "biggest mistake" we have done by printing aycee's/tsm article called 'same song, different verse'. because "in this section aycee tells us her side of the story" yes, we did print that article by aycee, and from our point of view there is nothing wrong by publishing 'letters to the editor', lettertypes that can be found in every newspaper, magazine etc today. on the other hand, we find several (biased) comments in shock that do not belong there. here are only a few: "the shadow decided to kill his ass- kicking group" "mystic cavern changed group again, this time it's black reign+genesis, but for how long ?" "untill (now) they haven't proved to be the leading force" "i'd say this is a good point for cosmos to stop, as they are probably at their top right now" etcetcetc why not though ?!?! another one: in our 'did you know' section we reported on a guy from israel called keediz/the force, who was seen on an us-board. shock states: "...now, there is no such guy as a keediz/the force calling out at all, and at least not from israel." now that is really funny, genius writes "no such guy at all", and he continues "at least not from israel" quite contradictory, first you say 'not at all', then you say 'at least not from isreal'...genius doesn't even know about it by himself. he goes on: "i wrote that in our 'facts an not so factual' section, you read it, and wrote it in mamba< without checking if it was true" genius gene claims mamba< is copying news etc from shock. we won't even comment on this, except for the little remark that there has been a guy called 'keediz/the force' who was calling the excalibur hq, mysts of avalon, and he did claim he was from israel. everybody on this board did see him, so did we... no need to copy from shock's excellent news-section. there are more things shock wrote, there are more things mamba< could respond to. what you just saw were some examples to make clear how objective shock did report on mamba<. to sum it all up, genius gene writes the editor of mamba< has an attitude problem, and i still can't see it... maybe other people do have such kind of a problem... be sure that you won't find anything else about this matter in any further issue of mamba< since we just wanted to show only one time, as an example, how easy it is to make other people or their work look bad. not our business, other magazines or people might continue this. and to gene, i want to say thank you, because my doctor told me having a good laugh once in a while is quite healthy mamba<