Brutal Recall 09 ch07
From C64 Diskmag Wiki
"VOTES AND CHARTS" by tch/brutal! ---------------------------------------- i've read myself quite some articles or opinions about votes and charts... i will now write some text about some things i've read... also you can find my opinion about some REACTIONS you've sent to us! ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- you might have read an article about the socalled "COUNTRY VOTESHEET" in the mag "INTERNAL #12" which was written by EINSTEIN of w.o.w. he told us about his idea of the country-votesheet. he said that almost all charts are cheated in some way... now he got the idea to let every guy vote only for guys of the country he lives in. so he gave the example of belgium... "belgian guys can only vote for dudes that live in belgium... so you can't vote for DOC or CRUSH but only for POWERPLANT and other belgian guys." reason for this idea,was that mostly a guy knows what is happening in his own country. ---------------------------------------- okay,it looked like a very good idea to me,while i was reading it. but when i thought more about it i found out that it's no good at all! look,i live in holland. can you give me 5 good dutch crackers? these are what i could come up with: CBA/TRC,C+C/HOTLINE (they stopped!)... and that's it! okay,i only have 2 dutch contacts at the moment,but i saw some dutch cracks from other guys,but those were nothing special at all. the crackergroups are just as bad! the only thing the dutch scene is very good at is all what's legal! we got some of the best artists,like HEIN DESIGN,ORC,MIRAGE,REBEL MC... some good composers,JEROEN TEL,REYN O. we got some nice coders too,but they are surtenly not the best!! for me it would be impossible to make a fair top 5 of every category! i have to vote for guys of which i don't think they are good at all!!! would this be 'fair' voting? if i vote for SLASH/BRUTAL as one of the best coders while i can't vote for FLAMINGO/LIGHT... will that be fair? nope!! the charts will change for sure as the country with most scene-guys,like germany or denmark,will be highly representated in them while countries with smaller scenes won't be in by any chance!! that would for sure make the charts worse and not better!! and what if a group has members all over the globe,like LEGEND! they got members in germany,denmark, belgium and probably more. this way they can get votes in all those countries and they will rule for sure!!! well,i think that were enough other details about the 'country votesheet'. and i think if you want to make the charts more 'fair' that you'll have to think of something else than the 'country votesheet'... but if you still think it's a good idea then just do it... ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- most of the time when you use a disk- voter there are allready some names printed for which you have to give some points. mostly it are about 25 names of crackergroups which are often or always in the charts... this is maybe something good as you don't have write down the names all by yourself,but it also makes it tougher for the groups which are not listed to enter the charts. reason for this is that there's only place for about 5 groups of your own choise! this means it's not possible for you to give your own top 10 if it only contains unlisted groups. this isn't fair either and therefor i want to say to all the releasers of votesheets (disk or sheet) not to write any groupnames in or on them! let people make up their own minds without seing a couple of famous names and give points to groups/people they didn't think of voting for anyway. i know it's easier for you to count the votes,but it's simply not 'fair'! ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- in EMANUELLE #7 was in the craptalk chapter something about the way to count votesheets. the guys of WORLDNEWS had attacked EMANUELLE by saying they stole their counting-method. okay,we of BRUTAL RECALL count the votes like this... ---------------------------------------- number on votesheet: amount of points: ---------------------------------------- 1 10 2 9 3 8 4 5 6 6 5 4 8 3 9 2 10 1 lower than 10. 0 ---------------------------------------- we think this way is most fair! i know for sure that lots of other magazines count exactly the same as we do,but why should we start a war against them or say that they stole our counting-methods. does it really matter how you give points??? as long as you count all votes in the same way,the result will be the same and points are just there to make it easier!! but ofcourse you can't give points like: #1:100 #2:9 #3:8 #4:7.... this would more be something to show which group was voted most times on the number one spot. ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- here's a little reaction from REMIX/CLQ. ---------------------------------------- please remove the BRUTAL products and members from BRUTAL RECALL,as this makes the chart section quite unobjective. you're really successful in all the other mags in the scene,so you simply don't have to do this! please OMIT brutals in your mag. just an example: if i let clique products and members in SCRIPT,then script is #2 mag,i am #1 swapper, clique is always in the top 10 in demo and crack groups,our demo is in top 5 etc.etc... i know that this is NOT realistic,so i simply omit it! please think about it,you'll loose nothing,but you'll gain a very big thing: objectivity! please think about it. nearly NO mag does this,so i guess that's something logical! anyway,this was just one point. the rest of the mag is so perfect that i've got nothing else to say. much luck in editing,i know, your (our) job is very hard!! ---------------------------------------- okay,REMIX,thanx for your reaction... here's my answer to it... r.c.s. and i try to be as objective as possible and so we place everybody who is being voted for!!! (except for some that didn't do shit for ages!!) now you say we should take all BRUTAL products and members out of the charts because that is unobjective!?! why only the BRUTAL things?? R.C.S. of LEGEND spreads also lots of votesheets so if i will follow your advise,i should also omit LEGEND members out of the lists!!! will this be fair at all?!?!? NO WAY! legend is one of the top crack groups of the scene!!! in some other mags 'BRUTAL' is even higher in the charts than in this mag so we are unobjective!? because we are lower? no! (un)objectivity has nothing to do with the charts at all... it has something to do with the text and comments you write to things... and not how much text,but how you write the text... if you can notice from a text that the writer dislikes a certain group that much then you can tell he's not objective... but if we count the vote- sheets and print the UNCHEATED result,we are UNobjective?? come on! lots of guys spread the votesheet of this mag,i wanna thank them for that, so it's not only brutal that spreads them and lots of guys don't get them from brutalers. so should we OMIT all the groups of which some guys spread our votesheet? if we listen to you,we should,as you stated that it influences from who you got the votesheet,how you fill it in! okay,it's up to you for who you vote for and for who you don't! we won't OMIT anyone that has been active and is being voted for!! ofcourse there are some asslickers who vote for brutal,but i just want to tell them that i won't and can't remember who voted for us,so you won't be treated in any better way than any other person!! sometimes i get a votesheet on which i'm in the swapper-charts while i have NEVER swapped with this guy!! i surtenly have my feelings about this sheet but i'll count it!! also friend-policy rules the votesheet bussines... for instance lots of DUTCH guys voted for BURGLAR of SUCCESS in the cracker charts while NO FOREIGNER voted for him at all!! it'll count but i got myself again some strange feelings about it!! there are also guys that don't want to vote for anyone in the "ELITE".... this one just votes for the 'lamest' things in the scene. okay,it's strange but it counts!! so you see,the way a chart looks all depends on YOU!! we just count the votes and make the lists but we don't add anything else to them!!! and as long as you vote for anything it will be printed as long as it has enough points and has been active!! sorry for letting me go like this,but i simply got so sick of people that tell me to erase BRUTAL out of the charts! before you say anything again,please don't tell that we should take BRUTAL out only as LEGEND also takes a big (almost the half) of this magazine on them!! and if you compare our lists with lots of other lists you will find out that our lists have fucking much incomen with them!! for the last 3 issues we had more then 150 votesheets an issue,that means it is fucking realistic as lots of other mags only have around 50... (or even less!!) and please note if anyone votes for himself or his group it doesn't count! just keep this in mind,so you don't have to waste your time on faking yourself or your group!! i just want to say to all the voters... "think about your votes carefully!! compare the releases and abilities of the ones you vote for... simply don't give a damn about what other people will say,just vote for the ones you think that are best!! especialy we know how important it is to remain the identity of voters a secret to the rest!! simply because it's none of their bussines!!! don't be afraid to say your opinion and stand up for yourself!!! ignore the lamers that say that you should vote for him or them and do what you think is best!!!" ---------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------