Propaganda 11 ch06

 FEEDBACK
 FEEDBACK

________________________________________
After the release of Propaganda #1O some
time back, I noticed some pretty funny
occurences I will take up here.

It seems I pushed some sort of a button
thru that release, pissing some of, and
attracting some. You can only be wise
enough to take a stand, and consider
us either way you prefer.

One thing I do like, is the expansion
of diskmagazines. It seems the loss
of SHOCK and others somehow pulled
the trigger, and urged you to start



publishing new magazines, since we
at PROPAGANDA were so determined in
what we were doing. The more magazines
that appear, the more competition there
will be - competition serves better
magazines, focusing on the reality of
the scene. Therefore it is my firm
belief the magazines will get better.
(again)

Funny thing, however, is that one
certain magazine consider themselves
to be very good. In fact they are,
but they have a very wicked attitude.
Ladies and Gentlemen, I'm talking THE
PULSE here. Sure, I agree, it is a fine
magazine you're doing, but at the
expense of others.



You have a tendency of throwing crap
at PROPAGANDA, when you in fact should
be concentrating on your own work. Sure,
criticts are valuable, and endorse you
to take it further, but I wouldn't want
to call it critics, slagging down on
a mag by telling the crowds that 'WE
ARE BETTER', 'THEY ARE DELAYED AGAIN -
WE ARE NOT', 'THEY ARE FAKING THEIR
VOTES' ETC. When it all comes out, it
doesn't really matter whatever you
write about us, or if you dislike
the way we treat the news of the
scene (only talking about the top),
as the crowd one day will pick a
favorite. They will pick a favorite,
not based on what crap the magazine
writes about their competitor, but



based on the quality of the magazine and
its contents. In other words, what it
delivers. If you have a problem with us,
or fear us as the competitors we are,
that's ok, but dear PULSE-staff, it's
wise to deliver proper critics instead
of a childish bunch of nonsense.

That's what it is. Childish,
and goddamn ignorant in my eyes.

We have nothing against you. We welcome
a good magazine with open arms. But do
write, basing it on your own abilities,
not on ours.

                   ..
                   ><



Furthermore, I heard some nasty tounges
not that happy about the way we treated
the news last time. It may very well
be that you tended not to like it,
but we prefer it that way. We take
up and discuss the groups and events
that are worth mentioning. If not,
we do not. As simple as that.

Otherwise, we experienced very
positive reactions from the last
issue, and we are urging you to
keep them reactions coming.

We are here for you - you are
not here for us to have a reason
to put out a magazine.




Yours Sincerly,

Newscopy/Genesis*Project
October 18th, 1993.