<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Skyhigh_20_Shout_statement</id>
		<title>Skyhigh 20 Shout statement - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Skyhigh_20_Shout_statement"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?title=Skyhigh_20_Shout_statement&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-06-17T13:51:31Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.19.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?title=Skyhigh_20_Shout_statement&amp;diff=3859&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Ymgve at 17:20, 29 November 2007</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?title=Skyhigh_20_Shout_statement&amp;diff=3859&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2007-11-29T17:20:26Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;Shout statement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two magazines merged into one, released a single is-&lt;br /&gt;
sue and then - nothing.. What happend is the question&lt;br /&gt;
the scene keep asking. So far I couldn't answer that&lt;br /&gt;
question either until...&lt;br /&gt;
Until I got a letter from the source itself. So be sure&lt;br /&gt;
to read this text and get a lot of the answers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OFFICIAL STATEMENT CONCERNING THE UNEXPECTED&lt;br /&gt;
ABSENCE OF THE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SHOUT&lt;br /&gt;
SHOUT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yo pals... This text was written by one of the main-&lt;br /&gt;
editors of the magazine SHOUT! : Antifan/Equinoxe.&lt;br /&gt;
I want to clear up some of the rumours going around&lt;br /&gt;
and express my amazement concerning reactions to&lt;br /&gt;
our magazine. I would be glad if you all read the text&lt;br /&gt;
COMPLETELY, thank you!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that half a year has passed and people still did&lt;br /&gt;
not get a sign of life of the SHOUT. When issue one&lt;br /&gt;
was released, most sceners first admired all the work&lt;br /&gt;
which was put into the magazine. But then more and&lt;br /&gt;
more said that they had expected more from the fu-&lt;br /&gt;
sion of two chart-magazines. Some complained about&lt;br /&gt;
the logo, others disliked the style especially of the&lt;br /&gt;
menu and the rest assailed the text itself. Neverthe-&lt;br /&gt;
less the magazine climbed into the charts to a high&lt;br /&gt;
position as you all know. So this fact made me wonder&lt;br /&gt;
ing: What can be the reason that something is criti-&lt;br /&gt;
cized all the time and in spite of all complaints it get&lt;br /&gt;
a lot of votes by the scene? I did not make it to sol-&lt;br /&gt;
ve this problem, maybe you can help me! (Well I (Biz&lt;br /&gt;
Kid!) have a suggestion. Both Ingenious Brain and The&lt;br /&gt;
Reformation were magazines with a good amount of&lt;br /&gt;
votes before they merged. As the fusion went on, we&lt;br /&gt;
had this period where people voted for both the new&lt;br /&gt;
Shout but also the 2 'old' ones. This mag for one,&lt;br /&gt;
tried to solve the problem like this: we counted the&lt;br /&gt;
votes for IB &amp;amp;amp; Ref. Added these votes and divided 'em&lt;br /&gt;
by 2. This number was added to the votes of Shout.&lt;br /&gt;
See in this way Shout maybe did get a big helping hand&lt;br /&gt;
right from the start. In a way you got more votes&lt;br /&gt;
than deserved. Well nevertheless; now the people in&lt;br /&gt;
the scene had seen this mag high in the charts, and&lt;br /&gt;
if I am right then this was still in their mind as they&lt;br /&gt;
had to fill out the next votesheet!!! Correct me if I'm&lt;br /&gt;
wrong but isn't there a lot of voters who just vote&lt;br /&gt;
for the known groups, persons and mags?? I think so!&lt;br /&gt;
-Maybe this is the explanation, who knows. Anyway&lt;br /&gt;
back to the text - bk!)&lt;br /&gt;
Many complaints were not specific at all (again and&lt;br /&gt;
again statements like &amp;quot;I don't know whu, but the last&lt;br /&gt;
SHOUT! was not too special&amp;quot; could be found in the&lt;br /&gt;
magazines), but I want to explain at least some of the&lt;br /&gt;
questions which were asked in coherence with the&lt;br /&gt;
SHOUT! magazine:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Why did you release so few articles of Reformation?&lt;br /&gt;
Where has the Reformation style gone?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* You know that FLT is very inactive at the moment.&lt;br /&gt;
So were they when we worked at the completion of&lt;br /&gt;
the first SHOUT! issue. When Tabasco still was one&lt;br /&gt;
of the most active swappers, I got a massive amount&lt;br /&gt;
of votesheets by him. But when he intelligbly stop-&lt;br /&gt;
ped swapping becoz of studies, we got no response&lt;br /&gt;
from the FLT at all. So it was impossible for us in&lt;br /&gt;
EQX to release more FLT-articles as there were&lt;br /&gt;
hardly any articles from them. Concerning the style&lt;br /&gt;
I must say that it is hardly impossible to fuse two&lt;br /&gt;
outfits - what did you expect? The IB-outfit had&lt;br /&gt;
advantages like using a lot of colours (also anima-&lt;br /&gt;
ted), pictures and different fonts. The Reformation&lt;br /&gt;
outfit had other advantages indeed (like using dif-&lt;br /&gt;
ferent pages in the text mode, a great loader sys-&lt;br /&gt;
tem etc.) But both codes were developed by com-&lt;br /&gt;
pletely different coders, by TRON/FLT &amp;amp;amp; MR, WARP&lt;br /&gt;
and me, ANTIFAN/EQX. Coders just can cooperate if&lt;br /&gt;
they are a good team and if they work together at&lt;br /&gt;
the same place. In the case of SHOUT!, all changes&lt;br /&gt;
had to be done by one coder, and we in EQX neither&lt;br /&gt;
had the source-code of the Reformation nor ideas&lt;br /&gt;
what to change alot. We wanted to keep our complex&lt;br /&gt;
text outfit, and as you know, we expanded the sys-&lt;br /&gt;
tem by making different background colours and&lt;br /&gt;
super-hires pictures possible. The onlu soloution&lt;br /&gt;
to make the fusion more visible would have been a&lt;br /&gt;
totally new outfit, but our aim since the beginning&lt;br /&gt;
og the IB had been to improve the text system, and&lt;br /&gt;
by creating a completely other styled magazine the&lt;br /&gt;
facility of using pictures and the manipulation of&lt;br /&gt;
the colour-ram would probably have been lost. And&lt;br /&gt;
we knew that most sceners expected pictures,&lt;br /&gt;
didn't you? Anyway, to the next question (or better&lt;br /&gt;
reaction)...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. There were a lot of mistakes in the sytem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* All first issues have mistakes which will be removed&lt;br /&gt;
in the future (one of the the mistakes resulted in&lt;br /&gt;
the unfairness that the colour-ram stayed at the&lt;br /&gt;
screen while the text flashed out..)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The logo was not good enough.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I don't understand why quite a lot of people disliked&lt;br /&gt;
the logo - it was the best of all we got in that&lt;br /&gt;
short time (I really missed the work of the FAIR-&lt;br /&gt;
LIGHT'ers....), and I really have to thank DRAZ for&lt;br /&gt;
painting it!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. What's the reason for your delay?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* There are a lot of reasons why the next SHOUT! was&lt;br /&gt;
not released yet. The main reason is that all mem-&lt;br /&gt;
bers of EQX+FLT are fuckin lazy (including me) -or&lt;br /&gt;
better: inactive. I don't know exactly what is up&lt;br /&gt;
with the pals in Fairlight, but in EQX Mr. Warp ( or&lt;br /&gt;
simply WARP as he calls himself now( didn't turn on&lt;br /&gt;
his sixty-four for some months now - he is just&lt;br /&gt;
lamin' around in the Net and coding a mud with some&lt;br /&gt;
others. Maybe you've met him on the Internet C64&lt;br /&gt;
Channel already as he's nearly every day on that&lt;br /&gt;
damned system..&lt;br /&gt;
No I don't want to condem the Internet for all times&lt;br /&gt;
as it got a huge importance in a very short time and&lt;br /&gt;
it has thousand of advantages to other communica-&lt;br /&gt;
tion systems. But too many people left unnecessary&lt;br /&gt;
words about th system (just everyone think that it&lt;br /&gt;
is fine to talk about the system, but we were one&lt;br /&gt;
of the first in the SHOUT! to talk about it...), so I&lt;br /&gt;
finally return to the topic...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm quite busy with my work for the year in school, so&lt;br /&gt;
I got very inactive just sending out 1 or 2 sendings&lt;br /&gt;
per MONTH. More to that later. We also got a bit spirit&lt;br /&gt;
less releasing another SHOUT! as we had so much to&lt;br /&gt;
do for it - writing all the articles (the magazine had&lt;br /&gt;
more text than the holy last issue of the Turkish mag&lt;br /&gt;
SCRI PT - and IB#5 had more, too! If you don't believe&lt;br /&gt;
this fact, then count every single byte and get the&lt;br /&gt;
proof) editing the vote-sheets, looking for pictures,&lt;br /&gt;
collecting all the articles of the different editors.&lt;br /&gt;
Then people said the text was not as good as in the&lt;br /&gt;
issue before - but we didn't know why! Indeed most&lt;br /&gt;
people did not read too many of the articles, so they&lt;br /&gt;
were not able to rate the real quality. We got the&lt;br /&gt;
best reactions from sceners reading the whole text.&lt;br /&gt;
On the one side this is logical as you keep on reading&lt;br /&gt;
a magazine when you like it - but on the other side&lt;br /&gt;
you should not rate the quality of a text if you just&lt;br /&gt;
load the charts, the news and maybe 3-4 other chap-&lt;br /&gt;
ters. So I really refered also to the critic concerning&lt;br /&gt;
the text quality - first inform yourself before you&lt;br /&gt;
give ratings (this wisdom is valid for all statements&lt;br /&gt;
people do...)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So as a resume I want to say that it probably was a&lt;br /&gt;
mistake to fuse with the Reformation as many people&lt;br /&gt;
expected something as a result. You shouldn't wonder&lt;br /&gt;
to get a mag called INGENIOUS BRAIN next as it would&lt;br /&gt;
be senceless to continue a two-group-magazine when&lt;br /&gt;
one group does nothing. I hope that no one thinks&lt;br /&gt;
that I wnat to rag on the members of Fairlight - I got&lt;br /&gt;
no right to do this as every scener and every group&lt;br /&gt;
has reasons to stop his activities.&lt;br /&gt;
I just want to point out that it was not possible to&lt;br /&gt;
create a magazine that fulfills all ideas of a fused&lt;br /&gt;
mag becoz of this circumstances! Probably no one was&lt;br /&gt;
even able to anticipate the consequences of the fu-&lt;br /&gt;
sion: extreme inactivity. So it is quite sure that there&lt;br /&gt;
won't be a second SHOUT, but another Ingenious Brain&lt;br /&gt;
But I don't want to declare the SHOUT! as dead as you&lt;br /&gt;
never can know if the mebers of Fairlight (and esp.&lt;br /&gt;
those who edited the Reformation in the past) will get&lt;br /&gt;
active again - so just be satisfied with the assertion&lt;br /&gt;
that the magazine is in a state of suspended anima-&lt;br /&gt;
tion. - IT IS NOT DEAD YET!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are a mag-editor and you are nerved of the&lt;br /&gt;
high position of the SHOUT! (a big thank you to all of&lt;br /&gt;
you who are still voting for us, he he!) then think of&lt;br /&gt;
all the other inactive magazines in the charts and&lt;br /&gt;
wonder.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A last comment to the people having contacted me:&lt;br /&gt;
At the moment real life is more important for me -&lt;br /&gt;
sorry, I don't have the time to reply to everyone! You&lt;br /&gt;
know my adverts - I never wrote &amp;quot;100% reply&amp;quot; in the&lt;br /&gt;
last months, even a year now, as I don't have the time&lt;br /&gt;
to answer everyone! So don't come and call me disk-&lt;br /&gt;
stealer, you should know the circumstances! For all&lt;br /&gt;
Germans: Stop your fuckin &amp;quot;1,30 DM Warensendung&amp;quot; if&lt;br /&gt;
you put paers into the envelope - it costs me 2,7DM&lt;br /&gt;
for every sending... Read also the POSTAGE article in&lt;br /&gt;
the SHOUT! #1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So a nig thank you to all who read this article com-&lt;br /&gt;
pletely - if you got questions and you wabt a sure&lt;br /&gt;
reply, call XXXXXXXXXXX.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Signed                                     ANTIFAN&lt;br /&gt;
ANTIFAN&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And her at last his addy for reactions towards this&lt;br /&gt;
article:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ymgve</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>