<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Propaganda_16_ch04</id>
		<title>Propaganda 16 ch04 - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Propaganda_16_ch04"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?title=Propaganda_16_ch04&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-06-15T11:45:53Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.19.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?title=Propaganda_16_ch04&amp;diff=1513&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Ymgve at 19:51, 18 June 2007</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?title=Propaganda_16_ch04&amp;diff=1513&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2007-06-18T19:51:25Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 W&lt;br /&gt;
 Where did all the profiles go?    **&lt;br /&gt;
________________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
 So the scene is not what it once was.&lt;br /&gt;
The past few years we've gone through a&lt;br /&gt;
remarkable change, in all possible ang-&lt;br /&gt;
les. To be honest, we've actually been&lt;br /&gt;
going through changes rapidly since the&lt;br /&gt;
very dawn of what we usually refer to as&lt;br /&gt;
the scene. Technology made that poss-&lt;br /&gt;
ible. And most importantly, we, the&lt;br /&gt;
people made that possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, the digital underground repres-&lt;br /&gt;
ents a civilized culture, and though we&lt;br /&gt;
have been on a slight decline the past&lt;br /&gt;
5 years, we've maintained the hardly&lt;br /&gt;
achieved structure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      ___________________________&lt;br /&gt;
       &amp;quot;W&lt;br /&gt;
        We lack the people that&lt;br /&gt;
        stick out their heads..&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      ___________________________&lt;br /&gt;
However, calling the boards, reading the&lt;br /&gt;
magazines and talking to the people of&lt;br /&gt;
today, one thing has crossed my mind.&lt;br /&gt;
We lack the profiles. We lack the people&lt;br /&gt;
that stick out their heads, who speak&lt;br /&gt;
their piece of mind and state an opin-&lt;br /&gt;
ion. Often, through the million bytes&lt;br /&gt;
we've travelled, many of these people&lt;br /&gt;
have been regarded as complaining and&lt;br /&gt;
moaning people, but in their mere ann-&lt;br /&gt;
oyance, it has been for the better.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
________________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People who were active, and had a clue&lt;br /&gt;
of what the scene was about didn't think&lt;br /&gt;
twice when speaking. Whenever there was&lt;br /&gt;
a lack of quality, whenever there were&lt;br /&gt;
things that could be done better, some&lt;br /&gt;
wise voice spoke, and at it's best&lt;br /&gt;
a debate on international basis that&lt;br /&gt;
finally led up to a change. Where is&lt;br /&gt;
that today? I get the feeling we've&lt;br /&gt;
stagnated. And yes, I do believe&lt;br /&gt;
we have.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      ____________________________&lt;br /&gt;
       &amp;quot;T&lt;br /&gt;
        Today most magazines look&lt;br /&gt;
        the same. They deliver the&lt;br /&gt;
        the same news, the same&lt;br /&gt;
        charts...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      ____________________________&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Look at us today. And what we have. Take&lt;br /&gt;
the magazines for instance. There must&lt;br /&gt;
be a million of them, and there has been&lt;br /&gt;
since SEX N' CRIME was launched explored&lt;br /&gt;
new grounds. Today most magazines look&lt;br /&gt;
the same. They deliver the same news,&lt;br /&gt;
the same charts and the oh-so tradition-&lt;br /&gt;
al interviews that always cover the&lt;br /&gt;
victims 'MostLiked/Favorites'. Debates&lt;br /&gt;
are rare, and if any, mostly it is a&lt;br /&gt;
one-man show, like this one, that I&lt;br /&gt;
doubt will ever get any response in pure&lt;br /&gt;
text. If it does however, I've succeeded&lt;br /&gt;
in the task of stirring the grind. The&lt;br /&gt;
art of creating a debate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, what if the magazines dared. What&lt;br /&gt;
if they had the guts to create something&lt;br /&gt;
that boosted bonanza in the people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't get me wrong here, because I'm not&lt;br /&gt;
speaking GAMER'S GUIDE here. GAMER'S&lt;br /&gt;
GUIDE was a rather splendid idea for&lt;br /&gt;
starters, but as time flew by, quality&lt;br /&gt;
grew, and the firstreleases were not all&lt;br /&gt;
that different from the mailversions.&lt;br /&gt;
Today I dare saying that GAMER'S GUIDE&lt;br /&gt;
features a concept that is out of time.&lt;br /&gt;
It attracts few. No, what I'm speaking&lt;br /&gt;
about is radically new grips and angles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   _________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
    &amp;quot;M&lt;br /&gt;
     Many of us experienced&lt;br /&gt;
     DUKE offending, me included..&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   _________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
We at PROPAGANDA, were the first to&lt;br /&gt;
perform a more analytic view of the&lt;br /&gt;
groups newswise, instead of a mere re-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
port that speaks so little of what rea-&lt;br /&gt;
lly hides behind the curtain. We took&lt;br /&gt;
you there. This is a concept we intend&lt;br /&gt;
to keep, and we've noticed some others&lt;br /&gt;
have followed. Unfortunately, one of&lt;br /&gt;
the magazines, with ripe hunger, with&lt;br /&gt;
a slip of the tounge, passed away late&lt;br /&gt;
1994. Natuarlly, I have THE PULSE in&lt;br /&gt;
mind. Many of us experienced DUKE off-&lt;br /&gt;
ending, me included, but way down what&lt;br /&gt;
made THE PULSE so successful. The mag-&lt;br /&gt;
azine and editor had an attitude. Be&lt;br /&gt;
it your taste or not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why not bringing on new ideas and for-&lt;br /&gt;
mulas to the concept of a magazine? We&lt;br /&gt;
constantly try, this issue being some-&lt;br /&gt;
what of a pioneer, and by golly it is&lt;br /&gt;
not an easy task.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My point of view grows further. Mag-&lt;br /&gt;
azines represent only a part of the&lt;br /&gt;
scene, but do indeed function as roots&lt;br /&gt;
for changes in the entire scene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
        ________________________&lt;br /&gt;
         &amp;quot;S&lt;br /&gt;
          Shall we give points&lt;br /&gt;
          to basic-games or the&lt;br /&gt;
          public domain games?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
        ________________________&lt;br /&gt;
On the wareside, we have the neverending&lt;br /&gt;
growl of what is to be regarded as a&lt;br /&gt;
firstrelease. Is it the PAL-version,&lt;br /&gt;
or the NTSC-fixed version. Shall we&lt;br /&gt;
give points to basic-games or the public&lt;br /&gt;
domain games? And why does it have to be&lt;br /&gt;
a firstrelease when it reaches the&lt;br /&gt;
American boards, if I've had it by mail&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
since 2 weeks back. It has happened to&lt;br /&gt;
many releases in history. I'm not giving&lt;br /&gt;
the answers or stating an opinion. I'm&lt;br /&gt;
giving you questions to work at. To&lt;br /&gt;
talk about.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is elite, and what is lame? Is&lt;br /&gt;
there any of the kind?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a point in a group having 5&lt;br /&gt;
boards, or is one enough to cover the&lt;br /&gt;
purposes?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And where did the people go that talked&lt;br /&gt;
about it?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, by golly, bring on people like RADAR&lt;br /&gt;
who caused confusion and annoyance by&lt;br /&gt;
his behaviour. THOR, DUKE, BACCHUS,&lt;br /&gt;
WESTBAM, JANITOR, MASTERKRACKER and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PSYCHOBILLY among others did their&lt;br /&gt;
share. I feel some of you getting fru-&lt;br /&gt;
strated now. That is my purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         _____________________&lt;br /&gt;
          &amp;quot;I&lt;br /&gt;
           I say, do complain&lt;br /&gt;
           and do moan..&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         _____________________&lt;br /&gt;
Even CROSSFIRE, who will go to history&lt;br /&gt;
with his EXORY-chronicles, did his&lt;br /&gt;
share. What has he done, if not taken&lt;br /&gt;
a firm grip around the stick and stirred&lt;br /&gt;
around the pot? People like him have&lt;br /&gt;
given many of you a reason to act. Act&lt;br /&gt;
in fury, act in joy and in attempts to&lt;br /&gt;
change. That is why I regard people like&lt;br /&gt;
CROSSFIRE valuable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the boards would be filled with guys&lt;br /&gt;
posting 'Just passing by' and  'Off to&lt;br /&gt;
leech the latest', we'd have a plain&lt;br /&gt;
drag. Many, my friends, are like this.&lt;br /&gt;
Utterly dull and uninspiring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I say, do complain and do moan. Stir&lt;br /&gt;
the pot and create confusion. Knock&lt;br /&gt;
each other's socks off and boost crea-&lt;br /&gt;
tivity with YOUR ideas. Who dares wins&lt;br /&gt;
and who wins dares.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is still so much undone.&lt;br /&gt;
And with that in mind, I leave&lt;br /&gt;
it up to you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                             NEWSCOPY&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
________________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ymgve</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>