<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Jamaica_09_ch13_License_to_Kill</id>
		<title>Jamaica 09 ch13 License to Kill - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Jamaica_09_ch13_License_to_Kill"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?title=Jamaica_09_ch13_License_to_Kill&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-06-18T13:12:42Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.19.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?title=Jamaica_09_ch13_License_to_Kill&amp;diff=2316&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Ymgve at 14:31, 21 June 2007</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?title=Jamaica_09_ch13_License_to_Kill&amp;diff=2316&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2007-06-21T14:31:52Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;licence to kill                    tchad&lt;br /&gt;
----------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;
yepp, it's true! i (TCHAD) will edit my&lt;br /&gt;
first chapter in jamaica!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the topic i will discuss here is whether&lt;br /&gt;
it's right or wrong to have a national&lt;br /&gt;
army. you may be one of those who&lt;br /&gt;
consider a national army as compulsory&lt;br /&gt;
stuff but i'll try to make you recon-&lt;br /&gt;
sider this thing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
everywhere, you talk about friendship&lt;br /&gt;
and such, but in real life this dialogue&lt;br /&gt;
is not so widespread. this topic got&lt;br /&gt;
very actual for me some months ago when&lt;br /&gt;
one of my class-mates did something that&lt;br /&gt;
few dares to do. the materialistic act&lt;br /&gt;
was to destroy the nose-part of a&lt;br /&gt;
swedish attack-plane called VIGGEN. the&lt;br /&gt;
damage costed the swedish taxpayers&lt;br /&gt;
about 200000 sek ($25000). the ones who&lt;br /&gt;
did it, my class-mate and one person&lt;br /&gt;
more, had the argument that they had&lt;br /&gt;
turned something bad into something good&lt;br /&gt;
a killing-machine into a bunch of scrap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a huge debate followed over most of the&lt;br /&gt;
country. until the trial, i didn't speak&lt;br /&gt;
to my class-mate, because he was held in&lt;br /&gt;
jail and was not allowed to communicate&lt;br /&gt;
with anyone. on the day of the trial,&lt;br /&gt;
the courthouse was packed with people.&lt;br /&gt;
i'd bet that you could fill the&lt;br /&gt;
courtroom at least ten times.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
after at least seven or eight hours, he&lt;br /&gt;
was sentenced to 14 months in jail plus&lt;br /&gt;
a huge damages-pay. a few weeks later,&lt;br /&gt;
he returned to school and we discussed&lt;br /&gt;
this a lot. among other things, he told&lt;br /&gt;
me some interesting facts like :&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- the swedish army costs 40 BILLION SEK&lt;br /&gt;
  each year. (that may sound little but&lt;br /&gt;
  it's actually approximately 6.5% of&lt;br /&gt;
  the national budget, and it would be&lt;br /&gt;
  enough to support many many jobs,&lt;br /&gt;
  schools or environmental projects.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- many of the weapons used in bosnia is&lt;br /&gt;
  in fact swedish weapons, as before the&lt;br /&gt;
  war, yugoslavia was sweden's third&lt;br /&gt;
  biggest weapon exporting country.&lt;br /&gt;
  therefore, the argument that our&lt;br /&gt;
  weapons don't make any harm is wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- the army (in this case the swedish&lt;br /&gt;
  army) seems to be the only organisa-&lt;br /&gt;
  tion that gets money from the state to&lt;br /&gt;
  train people to break the law by&lt;br /&gt;
  killing other people. by that, he&lt;br /&gt;
  pointed out the great double standard&lt;br /&gt;
  of morality that is in sweden (and&lt;br /&gt;
  other countries). the only reason why&lt;br /&gt;
  sweden keeps its army is a false&lt;br /&gt;
  threat that thos in power have created&lt;br /&gt;
  just to make sure that they won't lose&lt;br /&gt;
  their jobs. for instance the submarin-&lt;br /&gt;
  es that noone has ever seen. the only&lt;br /&gt;
  indication of them was a russian crap-&lt;br /&gt;
  submarine that grounded outside karls-&lt;br /&gt;
  krona in 1982.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so, is it worth to have an army at all?&lt;br /&gt;
many people in sweden reckon that our&lt;br /&gt;
safety is based upon a strong army...&lt;br /&gt;
well, in my opinion, there can be no&lt;br /&gt;
safety at all with any kind of army in&lt;br /&gt;
the country. let's skip it all and use&lt;br /&gt;
the money wiser and guess which country&lt;br /&gt;
will invade us first...! (hehe) no,&lt;br /&gt;
seriously, of course we are forced to&lt;br /&gt;
have a defence system, but i am truly&lt;br /&gt;
against a weapon-based one. alternatives&lt;br /&gt;
may be a non-weapon local defence or an&lt;br /&gt;
army based upon gandhi's ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
one more example of the double morality&lt;br /&gt;
is that you, in sweden, from the beginn-&lt;br /&gt;
ing is taught to show respect to your&lt;br /&gt;
fellows and neighbours. then, suddenly,&lt;br /&gt;
when you are 17,18 or 19 you are forced&lt;br /&gt;
to be educated in killing other people&lt;br /&gt;
without them doing you any harm person-&lt;br /&gt;
ally. that's what i call exploitation of&lt;br /&gt;
power from those in power in a country.&lt;br /&gt;
to use the people against another people&lt;br /&gt;
almost as in germany in the 1930-40's.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
in fact you are able to choose civil-&lt;br /&gt;
service freely and everybody who chooses&lt;br /&gt;
that gets it. but it's still not good&lt;br /&gt;
enough. it should be optional to take&lt;br /&gt;
part in a military defence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
so, what do you think about this topic?&lt;br /&gt;
is it necessary to keep the army system?&lt;br /&gt;
if i don't remember wrongly, there was&lt;br /&gt;
a referendum in switzerland a couple of&lt;br /&gt;
years ago and there was about 40% of the&lt;br /&gt;
swiss people voting NO to their army...&lt;br /&gt;
is this right or have i dreamt this?&lt;br /&gt;
well, if it's true, i'm kind of impress-&lt;br /&gt;
ed... it is quite a large value that&lt;br /&gt;
wants the swiss army abolished. how&lt;br /&gt;
large is the amount in other countries?&lt;br /&gt;
those in power dare not try it!!?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 well, i hope you had a interesting time&lt;br /&gt;
       reading these few words...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 see you in som other chapter som other&lt;br /&gt;
                  time!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
       thanks for your attention!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                                  /tchad&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ymgve</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>