<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=DT_01_en_15</id>
		<title>DT 01 en 15 - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=DT_01_en_15"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?title=DT_01_en_15&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-10T16:13:14Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.19.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?title=DT_01_en_15&amp;diff=5812&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Nyquist at 22:50, 17 January 2011</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?title=DT_01_en_15&amp;diff=5812&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2011-01-17T22:50:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?title=DT_01_en_15&amp;amp;diff=5812&amp;amp;oldid=4998&quot;&gt;Show changes&lt;/a&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Nyquist</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?title=DT_01_en_15&amp;diff=4998&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Nyquist at 22:51, 16 February 2010</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?title=DT_01_en_15&amp;diff=4998&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2010-02-16T22:51:13Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                                    &lt;br /&gt;
+__________________________________  __+&lt;br /&gt;
| XX IN REVIEW: x-dome #09             |&lt;br /&gt;
| XX IN REVIEW: x-dome #09             |&lt;br /&gt;
|               __________             |&lt;br /&gt;
|                                      |&lt;br /&gt;
| _ released by: ROLE                  |&lt;br /&gt;
| _ releasedate: 99-07-01              |&lt;br /&gt;
| _ runs under : YES                   |&lt;br /&gt;
|   emulator?                          |&lt;br /&gt;
+________________________________    __+&lt;br /&gt;
                                   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Arman/Role  recently released the second&lt;br /&gt;
issue  of  his  mag  X-DOME  in  English&lt;br /&gt;
language  and  as the old X-DOME fanatic&lt;br /&gt;
I  still  am I couldn't hold myself back&lt;br /&gt;
from  taking a closer look at this issue&lt;br /&gt;
of course. So let's start!&lt;br /&gt;
........................................&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
_ TECHNICAL REMARKS&lt;br /&gt;
___________________&lt;br /&gt;
Hm,   does  X-DOME  work  together  with&lt;br /&gt;
cartridges    or   not?  Good  question!&lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes  it  indeed does and sometimes&lt;br /&gt;
it  does  not!  But  in  order  to  read&lt;br /&gt;
through  the whole magazine in one flash&lt;br /&gt;
without  reseting  your c64 all the time&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
you  really  should  follow Arman's hint&lt;br /&gt;
mentioned  in the directory and turn off&lt;br /&gt;
all  your  cartridges,  REU  expansions,&lt;br /&gt;
SCPU's and so on.&lt;br /&gt;
The  magsystem  features  a  quite  fast&lt;br /&gt;
build    in  software  speeder  however.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In  contrast  to former (german) issues,&lt;br /&gt;
both the keyboard- and joystick controls&lt;br /&gt;
are now working 100%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
_ THE INTRO&lt;br /&gt;
___________&lt;br /&gt;
There  is no intro this time, so nothing&lt;br /&gt;
more to tell here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
_ THE INTERFACE&lt;br /&gt;
_______________&lt;br /&gt;
The  main  menu  picture pixeled by VIP/&lt;br /&gt;
ROLE  looks  a  bit  strange in my eyes,&lt;br /&gt;
it  seems  to  me, gold old VIP mixed up&lt;br /&gt;
a  bit  too  many  different styles this&lt;br /&gt;
time.    However  the  big  &amp;quot;X  D&amp;quot;  Logo&lt;br /&gt;
underlayed  by  a  stone-like background&lt;br /&gt;
pattern  looks quite great, the contrast&lt;br /&gt;
in colours was well chosen.&lt;br /&gt;
The   really  &amp;quot;strange&amp;quot;  part  of  VIP's&lt;br /&gt;
picture  are  the icons representing the&lt;br /&gt;
four  main  groups  of  chapters the mag&lt;br /&gt;
is  divided in, because you really can't&lt;br /&gt;
recognize  which  icon  is  representing&lt;br /&gt;
what!  Of  course  you  can  find it out&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
quite  easily  with  one  single  click,&lt;br /&gt;
but  I  guess  creating some maybe a bit&lt;br /&gt;
more  suitable  icons wouldn't have been&lt;br /&gt;
such    a    great   afford,  would  it?&lt;br /&gt;
Would  you  e.g.  imagine  a girl with a&lt;br /&gt;
vibrator  standing  for the &amp;quot;Editorial&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
I guess not!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The  text  viewer  comes with a huge and&lt;br /&gt;
colourful  &amp;quot;X-Dome&amp;quot; logo in great shapes&lt;br /&gt;
pixeled   by  TMR/ONSLAUGHT/COSINE,  its&lt;br /&gt;
background  is  kept  in  dark gray, the&lt;br /&gt;
chars  in  light  grey, so a rather good&lt;br /&gt;
reading      comfort    is    guaranted.&lt;br /&gt;
The  status  bar  placed  directly under&lt;br /&gt;
the  logo  is  rather  useless  I'd say,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
but of course my opinion must not always&lt;br /&gt;
be right! Just see for yourself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All in all the outfit deserves a rating&lt;br /&gt;
of 06/15 points, I'd say.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
_ THE CHAPTERS&lt;br /&gt;
______________&lt;br /&gt;
These  are  naturally the most important&lt;br /&gt;
part  of  every  discmag,  so let's take&lt;br /&gt;
a closer look at them:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As  already  mentioned  some lines above&lt;br /&gt;
the  chapters  are  divided in four main&lt;br /&gt;
cathegories.&lt;br /&gt;
Let us call them &amp;quot;Editorial&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Demoscene&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Forum&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Miscellaneous&amp;quot; and last but not&lt;br /&gt;
least &amp;quot;Party Tales&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The  EDITORIAL  Section  comes up with a&lt;br /&gt;
long  Leading  Article written by Arman,&lt;br /&gt;
in  which  he mainly tries giving people&lt;br /&gt;
some  more or less important tips in how&lt;br /&gt;
enjoying  reading almighty X-DOME and so&lt;br /&gt;
on. Yeah, very intereresting...&lt;br /&gt;
The  second part of this text deals with&lt;br /&gt;
gerneral  information  about  the X-DOME&lt;br /&gt;
Staff, Credits and so on.&lt;br /&gt;
Altogether this is not what I would call&lt;br /&gt;
a  good  preface  for  a  c64  magazine,&lt;br /&gt;
unless you're a ROLE-Member of course!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Reactions    contains    two  individual&lt;br /&gt;
reactions  on  issue  #8  by  RORSCHACH/&lt;br /&gt;
PADUA/NO-NAME  and  a  guy called TUISKO&lt;br /&gt;
STEINHOFF   (never  heard  of  him)  and&lt;br /&gt;
several  answers  on  general  questions&lt;br /&gt;
to  the  editors.  Nothing special here,&lt;br /&gt;
just a chapter nearly every mag nowadays&lt;br /&gt;
has, I believe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Adress List has become quite a small&lt;br /&gt;
one  this  time,  this surely depends on&lt;br /&gt;
the low annount of snail sheets that got&lt;br /&gt;
spread with issue #8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK, so much for the EDITORIAL.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The   DEMOSCENE  FORUM  covers  a  large&lt;br /&gt;
annount    of    different    kinds   of&lt;br /&gt;
information about the latest happenings&lt;br /&gt;
in our scene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The  News  Part  has  become quite a big&lt;br /&gt;
one   this  time,  most  of  the  really&lt;br /&gt;
actual  and  varied  news  on the latest&lt;br /&gt;
incidents  in nearly all active nowadays&lt;br /&gt;
scene  groups  got supplied by MacGyver/&lt;br /&gt;
DMAGIC,  a  name that stands for nothing&lt;br /&gt;
than quality for sure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next  is  Charts, with just 17 votesheet&lt;br /&gt;
fillers  this  time, due to some mistake&lt;br /&gt;
the  staff made by spreading the sheets.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah,  things  can  only  get  better...&lt;br /&gt;
No further comment here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This  issues  Scene  Poll deals with the&lt;br /&gt;
situation    of    todays    mag  scene.&lt;br /&gt;
It  got  spread  by  Arman via E-Mail to&lt;br /&gt;
some  chosen  guys  (what  about  making&lt;br /&gt;
public   scene  polls,  dude?)  and  the&lt;br /&gt;
majority  of  its  fillers  still regard&lt;br /&gt;
the  mag  scene  as  mega-active and are&lt;br /&gt;
more  than  satisfied  with  the annount&lt;br /&gt;
of  mags  getting  released  these days.&lt;br /&gt;
Well,  I  guess  you  don't  have  to be&lt;br /&gt;
Albert  Einstein  to  realize  that this&lt;br /&gt;
cannot  be  the case, but if you look at&lt;br /&gt;
the  fillers names you might understand.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
What  the  heck  do people like MR. SEX,&lt;br /&gt;
FUNGUS,    FANGORN,   etc.,  whose  only&lt;br /&gt;
activity  seems  to  be  hanging  around&lt;br /&gt;
in  #C-64  IRC  know about the situation&lt;br /&gt;
of  todays  mag  scene? Nothing, because&lt;br /&gt;
they're  simply  not  involved  in  this&lt;br /&gt;
field!  Sorry  Arman,  but you asked the&lt;br /&gt;
wrong    guys  about  the  wrong  topic!&lt;br /&gt;
You    can't  just  surf  through  #C-64&lt;br /&gt;
picking  some  guys  you think are known&lt;br /&gt;
enough  for  you  and your mag profiling&lt;br /&gt;
yourself    and   leaving  the  entirely&lt;br /&gt;
topic  behind!  It  really  seems  to me&lt;br /&gt;
that  Arman  just  wanted  to  have some&lt;br /&gt;
popular   names  in  his  magazine,  his&lt;br /&gt;
attitude should be clear...&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The  Profile of Nastiness, Inc. I guess,&lt;br /&gt;
there  nobody who does not know the name&lt;br /&gt;
of    the  former  main  editor  of  the&lt;br /&gt;
legendary  Tribune  Magazine. Although I&lt;br /&gt;
really    cannot    see  much  sense  in&lt;br /&gt;
interviewing persons who left scene long&lt;br /&gt;
time  ago  and  have  no  connection  to&lt;br /&gt;
todays  scene  any  more, this interview&lt;br /&gt;
really  contains  some  very interesting&lt;br /&gt;
thoughts  not only about scene business.&lt;br /&gt;
So  it's really worth reading after all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Magreview Number 1 starts with a list of&lt;br /&gt;
all(?)  magazines that got released from&lt;br /&gt;
November  of '98 till July of '99. Quite&lt;br /&gt;
an  unusual way to start such a chapter,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
why  not  simply  putting this list into&lt;br /&gt;
the  Newsflash? At least one mag, namely&lt;br /&gt;
Dimension  Issue#2  with  the releasdate&lt;br /&gt;
of  June  29th  1999  is missing in this&lt;br /&gt;
list,  so  be careful with the phrase of&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;all&amp;quot;.  After  Arman is finally finished&lt;br /&gt;
with  his  blabla about active mailscene&lt;br /&gt;
(yeah,  maybe back in 1998, but...) once&lt;br /&gt;
again, he decides that it's now time for&lt;br /&gt;
starting  with  the  first review of non&lt;br /&gt;
other  mag  than  Dimension  Issue#1  by&lt;br /&gt;
Tempest.&lt;br /&gt;
The  review itself could have been a bit&lt;br /&gt;
more  detailed  in some ways, also style&lt;br /&gt;
and use of language cannot be classified&lt;br /&gt;
as originla or brilliant.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just  look  at  phrases like &amp;quot;(...)under&lt;br /&gt;
the  lead  of the maineditor Floyd(...)&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
or  &amp;quot;(...)during  the  whole  magazine a&lt;br /&gt;
nice Dimension Logo by JB is filling the&lt;br /&gt;
right  side  of  the screen (...)&amp;quot; which&lt;br /&gt;
are neither grammatically correct nor do&lt;br /&gt;
they    represent    a   good  piece  of&lt;br /&gt;
journalistic style.&lt;br /&gt;
Objectivity  is  surely  given  in  this&lt;br /&gt;
review,  but it's quality and style that&lt;br /&gt;
are missing!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Magreview Number 2 deals with Xenoglossy&lt;br /&gt;
Issue  #2 by Banshee. No further comment&lt;br /&gt;
here,  just  look  at  my remarks above,&lt;br /&gt;
because here it's just the same...&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mags  Today  happenes to be some sort of&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Arman's   Guide  to  Magazine  Galaxy&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
It comes up with a list of all magazines&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;alive&amp;quot;  today.  Well, I don't think you&lt;br /&gt;
can  call  mags  like &amp;quot;Driven&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Nitro&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Propaganda&amp;quot;,    &amp;quot;Relax&amp;quot;    (hahahaha!),&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Vandalism  News&amp;quot;, etc. &amp;quot;alive&amp;quot; any more&lt;br /&gt;
better  phrases  would  be &amp;quot;delayed like&lt;br /&gt;
hell&amp;quot;    or  even  &amp;quot;dead&amp;quot;  (in  case  of&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Driven&amp;quot;  and  &amp;quot;Relax&amp;quot;  (which  got  NOT&lt;br /&gt;
released under the label of Oxyron, dear&lt;br /&gt;
Arman,  but  PHUTURE) this one surely is&lt;br /&gt;
the right choise.&lt;br /&gt;
However the guide also features a second&lt;br /&gt;
list  with  so-called  &amp;quot;important&amp;quot;  mags&lt;br /&gt;
that  died  in  the  course  of the last&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
couple  of  years.  Hm, the question is,&lt;br /&gt;
do  magazines  like  &amp;quot;Adwarp English&amp;quot; or&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Necropsy&amp;quot;    really    fit    in  here?&lt;br /&gt;
I  and  also  many  other  people do not&lt;br /&gt;
think they ever played such an important&lt;br /&gt;
role    in  the  mag  scene  after  all!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The last article in this forum is called&lt;br /&gt;
The  Party 8-Music Review (hm, was there&lt;br /&gt;
just  one  tune  released  in Aars?) and&lt;br /&gt;
it's    supplied    by   ABBADON/DAMAGE.&lt;br /&gt;
All  in  all  his  reviews  are  nothing&lt;br /&gt;
special.  The only critical remarks that&lt;br /&gt;
could  be  mentioned here are that he in&lt;br /&gt;
some  (not  all!)  of  his reviews could&lt;br /&gt;
have  gotten  a  bit  more  into detail,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
also  it  would  have been a rather nice&lt;br /&gt;
idea  playing  the tunes both on old and&lt;br /&gt;
new  SID  in  order  to  point  out  the&lt;br /&gt;
differences  in quality, e.g. concerning&lt;br /&gt;
RAYDEN's  tune!  These  things meanwhile&lt;br /&gt;
should  be standard in every party music&lt;br /&gt;
reviews, shouldn't they?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MISCELLANEOUS  features articles dealing&lt;br /&gt;
with  topics  from  in-  and outside the&lt;br /&gt;
scene.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The  C64  XXX  Report  is supposed to be&lt;br /&gt;
some  kind  of  &amp;quot;review&amp;quot;  of several C64&lt;br /&gt;
Erotics  GFX  Collections.  This article&lt;br /&gt;
is simply pure trash with no sense in it&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
at  all  and  a pure catastrophe both in&lt;br /&gt;
language   and  style!  It  reminds  the&lt;br /&gt;
reader  of  the  good  old  XDOME german&lt;br /&gt;
times  immediately,  when  such articles&lt;br /&gt;
were  published  in  every single issue!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#C64   Everyday  Life  just  contains  a&lt;br /&gt;
(platin    old)    logfile  from  #C-64.&lt;br /&gt;
Well, better check out the IRC yourself!&lt;br /&gt;
But  anyway  you  get  here  some really&lt;br /&gt;
good  tips on what you should definately&lt;br /&gt;
NOT  do  in  #C-64, unless you'd like to&lt;br /&gt;
be    kicked    and  banned  of  course!&lt;br /&gt;
Arman  however  seems to have confounded&lt;br /&gt;
#C-64  with  #Erotic somehow, hasn't he?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Role   Diaries  is  surely  one  of  the&lt;br /&gt;
biggest  articles  in  the  entire  mag,&lt;br /&gt;
telling  the  complete  group history of&lt;br /&gt;
the  known  belgium  crew  from its very&lt;br /&gt;
beginning  till  today,  written  in the&lt;br /&gt;
form of a diary. It's really interesting&lt;br /&gt;
to  read  such a detailed profile of one&lt;br /&gt;
of  the  oldest  and still active groups&lt;br /&gt;
in  our  scene.  The  article would have&lt;br /&gt;
been   even  more  perfect  without  the&lt;br /&gt;
catastrophal  English  in  some passages&lt;br /&gt;
and the strange change of point of views&lt;br /&gt;
(although  it is supposed to be a diary,&lt;br /&gt;
there  are  several  passages written in&lt;br /&gt;
the  third person point of view and then&lt;br /&gt;
suddenly COMMANDER, the author, suddenly&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
becomes  a  first person narrator again.&lt;br /&gt;
There    are  also  several  remarks  by&lt;br /&gt;
OCHRANA placed in brackets in the course&lt;br /&gt;
of  whole  article  which are are little&lt;br /&gt;
bit disturbing, I'd say.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next  is  an  Advertisement  on  the new&lt;br /&gt;
SID COLLECTION CD by XENOX/AFL'70, taken&lt;br /&gt;
from    the    internet,    followed  by&lt;br /&gt;
an   article  by  OCHRANA  dealing  with&lt;br /&gt;
different   aspects  of  the  Millennium&lt;br /&gt;
problem.  Although the article itself is&lt;br /&gt;
quite  detailed,  it  does not bring any&lt;br /&gt;
new  aspects the majority of the readers&lt;br /&gt;
did  not  know so before already anyway!&lt;br /&gt;
The  article  (or  at least parts of it)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
are  seemingly copied from some computer&lt;br /&gt;
magazine,  at  least  there  are  a  few&lt;br /&gt;
indicators for this supposition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In  the  second  edition  of  his column&lt;br /&gt;
Taxes  or  what?  COMMANDER compares car&lt;br /&gt;
taxes  in  different european countries,&lt;br /&gt;
coming    to  the  conclusion  that  car&lt;br /&gt;
drivers  from  the Benelux States should&lt;br /&gt;
better move to Luxemburg.&lt;br /&gt;
Does    this    article  really  feature&lt;br /&gt;
anything  new?  Well,  that's  also  the&lt;br /&gt;
question here!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OK, so much about this section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
PARTY  TALES!  Yeah,  this one is really&lt;br /&gt;
great!    It  features  loads  of  party&lt;br /&gt;
results,    reports    and    of  course&lt;br /&gt;
invitations. Party on!&lt;br /&gt;
Hopefully  the  staff will keep on their&lt;br /&gt;
good  work  with this section in further&lt;br /&gt;
issues.&lt;br /&gt;
The only funny thing here is (of course)&lt;br /&gt;
COMMANDER's  Mekka+Symposium  2k-1 party&lt;br /&gt;
report in really &amp;quot;perfect and brilliant&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
English.  Well  Serge,  I  really cannot&lt;br /&gt;
remember myself having taken an airplane&lt;br /&gt;
to  get  home  (as you mentioned in your&lt;br /&gt;
report).    Always  remember:  It's  not&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;to  flee, flight, flight&amp;quot; but &amp;quot;to flee,&lt;br /&gt;
fled, fled&amp;quot;, dude!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
If  you  haven't  found  out  already, a&lt;br /&gt;
click  on  the  grey  and  sick  looking&lt;br /&gt;
lady  in  the middle of the right border&lt;br /&gt;
leads    you    into   the  music  menu,&lt;br /&gt;
featuring    four   exclusive  tunes  by&lt;br /&gt;
AGEMIXER,  GLENN  RUNE  GALLEFOS  and DA&lt;br /&gt;
BLONDIE  and  some  three additonal ones&lt;br /&gt;
by TRIDENT and TAKI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well,  it's  surely not easy judging the&lt;br /&gt;
chapter's  quality  of  the  entire mag.&lt;br /&gt;
On  the  one  hand we have the brilliant&lt;br /&gt;
News  Part  and  Party  Coverage, but on&lt;br /&gt;
the  other hand there is the rest of the&lt;br /&gt;
articles,  whose  quality  differs  from&lt;br /&gt;
rather   good  (Role  Diaries),  average&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(Music  Reviews)  down  to lowest pieces&lt;br /&gt;
of  crap  (Commodore  XXX  Report, #C-64&lt;br /&gt;
Everyday life e.g.).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One  aspect which was disturbing me most&lt;br /&gt;
while   reading  through  the  different&lt;br /&gt;
chapters  was  the  lack  of  affort the&lt;br /&gt;
maineditors  ARMAN  and COMMANDER put on&lt;br /&gt;
style and language. OK, you judge X-DOME&lt;br /&gt;
as  a  second  XENOGLOSSY  (the  mag  by&lt;br /&gt;
Banshee)    with  spelling  mistakes  in&lt;br /&gt;
every  second  line, BUT if there is one&lt;br /&gt;
thing  that  needs  to  be  improved  in&lt;br /&gt;
furher  issues than it is definately the&lt;br /&gt;
use of the English language!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The  annount of crap texts also could be&lt;br /&gt;
reduced    a  bit,  replacing  these  by&lt;br /&gt;
quality  articles  dealing  with  topics&lt;br /&gt;
the  sceners  are  really interested in!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry dudes, but any rating of more than&lt;br /&gt;
07/15 would have been a rather bad joke!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
_ TEXT LAYOUT&lt;br /&gt;
_____________&lt;br /&gt;
The mag features a 1x1 characterset done&lt;br /&gt;
by  my  old  buddy SHRI SADHU/EX-WILLOW.&lt;br /&gt;
Everyone  who  knows  Michael's charsets&lt;br /&gt;
knows  that  they  stand for quality and&lt;br /&gt;
readable   chars  and  lots  of  special&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
characters    and   so  does  this  one.&lt;br /&gt;
Although  it's  surely  not the best one&lt;br /&gt;
Michael  ever  did  and  the  fact  that&lt;br /&gt;
(especially   in  the  bold  mode)  some&lt;br /&gt;
letters  are  sometimes  a  bit  hard to&lt;br /&gt;
read  due  to  the  fact  that the chars&lt;br /&gt;
are  maybe  a bit too small, it is still&lt;br /&gt;
absolutely  readable  and  fits into the&lt;br /&gt;
whole    magazine  (which  is  quite  an&lt;br /&gt;
important aspect in my mind).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quality of the layout itself differs&lt;br /&gt;
from  chapter  to  chapter.  On  the one&lt;br /&gt;
hand   we've  got  well  structured  and&lt;br /&gt;
sorted  News and Party Coverages, but on&lt;br /&gt;
the  other  hand  also very unstructured&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
articles  with loads of layout errors in&lt;br /&gt;
it  such  as  some of the reviews or the&lt;br /&gt;
Mekka+Symposium    2k-1  partyreport  by&lt;br /&gt;
Commander/Role for example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All in all I think that the editors made&lt;br /&gt;
much  too  less  use  of all the special&lt;br /&gt;
characters  their  character  set offers&lt;br /&gt;
them in order to pop up the whole layout&lt;br /&gt;
a bit.&lt;br /&gt;
Sumed  up  you  can  say  that  the text&lt;br /&gt;
layout   surely  is  not  bad  but  also&lt;br /&gt;
nothing special indeed.&lt;br /&gt;
So just an average rating of 07/15.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
_ SO WHAT...?&lt;br /&gt;
_____________&lt;br /&gt;
X-DOME  #9  features some highlights but&lt;br /&gt;
also  lots  of  crap  that better should&lt;br /&gt;
have been left out.&lt;br /&gt;
Also the mag is a bit too much Internet-&lt;br /&gt;
orientated   in  my  eyes.  Leaving  the&lt;br /&gt;
snailmail  scene  out nearly completely,&lt;br /&gt;
time  will  show  how long this is gonna&lt;br /&gt;
work properly (I guess you all remember&lt;br /&gt;
the spreading mistake in connection with&lt;br /&gt;
with the last issue, don't you??)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Talking   about  Internet,  that's  also&lt;br /&gt;
the  source most of the quality chapters&lt;br /&gt;
in  this  issue  came  from! The editors&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
afford  of  writing  quality articles by&lt;br /&gt;
themselves  at  least  can't be rated as&lt;br /&gt;
extremely high after all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To  put  it  in  simple words, X-DOME on&lt;br /&gt;
this  level  is  an  average mag, mainly&lt;br /&gt;
ment  to  be  a forum for #C-64 Visitors&lt;br /&gt;
and  other  Netsurfers  who like strange&lt;br /&gt;
textstyles  and  giving  not more than a&lt;br /&gt;
cent  on  quality language and style, as&lt;br /&gt;
these  two  things  definately cannot be&lt;br /&gt;
found  in  this mag, at least not in the&lt;br /&gt;
two  english issues that got released so&lt;br /&gt;
far.  The  future  however  is  open for&lt;br /&gt;
everything of course!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
_ FINAL RATING&lt;br /&gt;
______________&lt;br /&gt;
Intro..............................+++++&lt;br /&gt;
Interface..........................06/15&lt;br /&gt;
Chapters...........................07/15&lt;br /&gt;
Text Layout........................07/15&lt;br /&gt;
OVERALL............................07/15&lt;br /&gt;
========================================&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
_______________________________SCORPE___&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Nyquist</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>