<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Brutal_Recall_03_ch09</id>
		<title>Brutal Recall 03 ch09 - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Brutal_Recall_03_ch09"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?title=Brutal_Recall_03_ch09&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-06-15T15:57:45Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.19.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?title=Brutal_Recall_03_ch09&amp;diff=1670&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Ymgve at 22:27, 18 June 2007</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://c64mags.untergrund.net/wiki/index.php?title=Brutal_Recall_03_ch09&amp;diff=1670&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2007-06-18T22:27:30Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
this is a reaction to the interview with&lt;br /&gt;
JATAGAN/X-RAY (see brutal recall issue2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
dear JATAGAN,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
at first i must underline that i got no&lt;br /&gt;
ANIT-JATAGAN-FEELINGS (to put it in that&lt;br /&gt;
way). i got really nothing against you.&lt;br /&gt;
i just can't agree with some statements&lt;br /&gt;
you gave in this interview.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
all the following crap concentrates on&lt;br /&gt;
your opinion about the democracy&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;GERMANY&amp;quot; and the context with the &amp;quot;RAF&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
o.k. you said that germany is no demo-&lt;br /&gt;
cracy because of the faults which were&lt;br /&gt;
made between the last two years (that&lt;br /&gt;
ex-ddr workers got only 60% of the money&lt;br /&gt;
as ex-brd workers for the same work and&lt;br /&gt;
so on) and that (and that is the point)&lt;br /&gt;
the RAF &amp;quot;will get everyone&amp;quot;. puh. do you&lt;br /&gt;
really mean what you said? if yes, i'm&lt;br /&gt;
deeply shocked!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
how could a terroristic organisation be&lt;br /&gt;
a competent alternative to the nowadays&lt;br /&gt;
government? do yo really belive that&lt;br /&gt;
killing a lot of people will change&lt;br /&gt;
ANYTHING?? that's bullshit! simply&lt;br /&gt;
nonsense. the RAF is as senseless as&lt;br /&gt;
their &amp;quot;DEEDS&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
o.k. i agree with you that the actual&lt;br /&gt;
government isn't a very competent one,&lt;br /&gt;
but that doesn't mean that we need a&lt;br /&gt;
kind of almighty observer who kills&lt;br /&gt;
everyone who isn't of the own opinion or&lt;br /&gt;
who makes faults!!! has this government&lt;br /&gt;
no right to make faults?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
yo said that you would like to see a&lt;br /&gt;
party like the KPD at the top of this&lt;br /&gt;
state. well, why not. the ideology is&lt;br /&gt;
quite good - theoraticaly. how the&lt;br /&gt;
practical consequences of this ideology&lt;br /&gt;
are you can see in the ex-ddr. it is&lt;br /&gt;
impossible to create a state, where all&lt;br /&gt;
inhabitants work for oneanother, because&lt;br /&gt;
every single human being has got his&lt;br /&gt;
egoistic wishes. this was the big&lt;br /&gt;
mistake which MARX made. theoratic,&lt;br /&gt;
the ideology of the communism is realy&lt;br /&gt;
good, but practical....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
but nevertheless, MARX and LENIN would&lt;br /&gt;
never had agreed with an organisation&lt;br /&gt;
like the &amp;quot;RAF&amp;quot;. or do you believe this?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to come to another topic: &amp;quot;ANARCHY will&lt;br /&gt;
come anyway&amp;quot;. is this a positive aspect&lt;br /&gt;
of the future? if there are no rights,&lt;br /&gt;
no norms, would that be a good world to&lt;br /&gt;
live in? on the contrary: only the&lt;br /&gt;
strongest will survive in such a world.&lt;br /&gt;
a democracy protects weaker guys from&lt;br /&gt;
stronger. and what about the money for&lt;br /&gt;
people who are on the dole? or human&lt;br /&gt;
rights? or things like health insurance?&lt;br /&gt;
do yo think that such institutions would&lt;br /&gt;
exist in an anarchy? or would you like&lt;br /&gt;
to miss them?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i just can't believe that you're really&lt;br /&gt;
of this opinion. maybe you just wanted&lt;br /&gt;
to say something cool at the phone.&lt;br /&gt;
that is the smae as if some brainless&lt;br /&gt;
guys shout something about HITLER and&lt;br /&gt;
his glory &amp;quot;deeds&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i hope that you take this letter as that&lt;br /&gt;
what is should be: a constructive&lt;br /&gt;
critic on your statement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                          yours, MIKE/SD&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
if you want to express your opinion&lt;br /&gt;
about this subject, or just want to give&lt;br /&gt;
a reaction about this send your letter&lt;br /&gt;
to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
             &amp;quot;BRUTAL RECALL&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
           XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX&lt;br /&gt;
           XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX&lt;br /&gt;
           XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ymgve</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>